- 注册时间
- 2007-10-26
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 日志
- 阅读权限
- 20
|
发表于 2009-4-17 05:26:18
|
显示全部楼层
The effect the pulling length has on the speed of air doughnut fired by an air-cannon
Physics 15 IB Period 4 of School Year 2008-09
2009-4-2
Problem
What effect does the pulling length of an air-cannon have on the speed of air doughnut fired by the air-cannon?
Introduction
First, the mechanism and structure of an air-cannon must be stated clear. An air-cannon’s components include a big box which has a round hole on one side and the surface opposite the hold dismantled, a large and strong plastic bag, a small plastic bag, four rubber bands, and sticky tape. When constructing the air-cannon, we cover the dismantled surface with the big plastic bag, use the sticky tape to hold it, then with a rubber band, the small plastic bag and some sticky tape, make a knob at the middle of the big plastic bag. Next, attach one end of the other rubber bands to the knob, the other ends to the inside of the box. Make sure that the rubber bands are pulled tight.
Here’s how an air-cannon works. When you pull the knob back, the rubber bands are stretched and the interval volume of the air-cannon increases. When you release the knob, the tension of the rubber bands will pull the knob back to where it originally was. As the knob returns to its original position, the internal volume of the air-cannon decreases suddenly, and air was pumped out of the air-cannon through the hole. We call this invisible “clump” of air an air doughnut. This can be explained by the Ideal Gas Law:
Where p is the absolute pressure of the gas, V is the volume of the gas, n is the number of moles of gas, R is the universal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature of the gas. As we pull back the knob, the volume of air in the box increases. Since T and p must stays constant, R is a constant, so n must increase. Air flows into the air-cannon. As the knob is released, the volume V decreases, and the number of moles of air, n decreases—air flows out of the air-cannon. Although the Ideal Gas Law only works with Ideal Gas, in most cases it’s a good approximation.
The whole idea of an air-cannon and the application of Ideal Gas Law is not new. In fact, the human kind has been applying this technology in military for hundreds of years. In third century BC, Ctesibius of Alexandria wrote the idea of a cannon using compressed air in his works. After the ancient Chinese invented the primitive form of gunpowder around 10th century, they quickly applied it to military use. The earliest known depiction of a cannon is a sculpture found in Sichuan Province, China in the 12th century. After the Arabs brought gunpowder to Europe, the Europeans improved the technology and artillery became an essential element of modern wars. The invention and application of cannons have dramatically affected the course of human history.
Cannons using gunpowder generally works this way: the cannonball will be placed at the front, while gunpowder will be placed at the behind. When someone lights the gunpowder, it burns quickly and the chemical energy stored in the powder is transformed into heat. The temperature of air in the cannon would increase dramatically in just a matter of seconds. As the internal volume of the cannon stays fairly constant, then according to the Ideal Gas Law, the internal pressure of the air within the cannon will increase and propel the cannonball out of the muzzle in a relatively great speed.
In our case, we still apply the Ideal Gas Law for the firing process. However, instead of using the gunpowder to increase the temperature, we decreased the volume of the air-cannon to increase the pressure and instead of shooting a solid cannonball, the air-cannon shoots invisible air “cannonballs”. The basic idea works the same.
We now have enough information to make a prediction. If the pulling length of the air-cannon increases, then the speed of the air doughnut will also increase; they are directly proportional. Because according to Hooke’s Law, the restoring force of the rubber bands is directly proportional to the length it is pulled. Since theoretically, the force and the pulling length have a linear relationship, and the force is 0 N if the pulling length is 0, so the average force is directly proportional to the maximum force, and thus, directly proportional to the pulling length, or symbolically:
As we regard the air doughnut as a mass point, we can apply the impulse-momentum theorem:
Since mass m is constant, if we assume that the time interval during which the force is applied, then we get the relationship:
Since is 0, plus the proportionality relationship between average force and the pulling length, we get the relationship:
If we plot this relationship on a graph, we get an oblique straight line passing through the origin:
Impulse is defined as , or in a simpler form: . If we manipulate the above equation by applying Newton’s Second Law of Motion: , we have:
This is called the impulse-momentum theorem. In general, it states that the impulse equals change in momentum.
As you can see in the predictions, the important assumptions of this lab includes: We assume that the rubber bands can be approximated by Hooke’s Law; we assume that the Ideal Gas Law can be used to approximate the air in the air-cannon; we assume that the air-doughnut has no volume and we assume that the air doughnut travels in a uniform motion.
To test our predictions, we set a distance for the air doughnut to travel, then we fire the air-cannon, and measure the time it takes for the air doughnut to cover the distance. Since we assume the air doughnut travels in uniform motion, and the distance is fixed, we can then calculate the speed of the air doughnut.
The independent variable of this experiment is the pulling length of the air-cannon, the dependent variable is the speed of the air doughnut, and important fixed variables include: the size of the air-cannon muzzle, the same air-cannon, the same person pulling the air-cannon and the same target for the air-cannon.
Materials
An air-cannon
A stand
A piece of tissue paper
Five meter measuring tape
Stop watch
Sticky tape
A piece of string (at least 50cm long)
A table big enough to put the air-cannon on
Procedure
Step 1: Tape the air-cannon to the table.
Step 2: Use the measuring tape, measure 4.00 m horizontally away from the “muzzle” of the air-cannon.
Step 3: Place the stand on the 4.00 m mark. Make sure that the muzzle of the air-cannon is aiming at the stand.
Step 4: Tie a piece of tissue paper on a string, then tie the other end of the string to the stand.
Step 5: Fire the air-cannon. Make sure that the tissue moves, which means that the air doughnut can hit the tissue. If it doesn’t move, then arrange the aiming direction of your air-cannon and repeat this step until the tissue can be moved by the air doughnut.
Step 6: Pull the knob back 15 cm, and then release the knob. Start timing with the stop watch the moment the knob is released, and stop timing when you see the tissue paper move. Record the time measurement.
Step 7: Repeat Step 6 four more times.
Step 8: Repeat Step 6-7 five more times, but each time, pull back the knob 20cm, 25cm, 30cm, 35cm and 40cm correspondingly.
Step 9: Calculate the speeds using the formula , where x is the distance traveled, v is the speed and t is the time interval. Then find the average speed and standard deviation of the speed of air doughnut.
Observations
Pulling length, x (cm±0.05cm) Time it takes for the air doughnut to reach the tissue, t (s±0.005s)
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6
15.00 1.54 1.34 1.65 1.62 1.76 1.63
20.00 1.18 1.15 1.10 1.32 1.23 1.35
25.00 0.81 0.72 0.85 0.78 0.76 0.85
30.00 0.64 0.62 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.64
35.00 0.56 0.53 0.52 0.55 0.52 0.55
40.00 0.40 0.43 0.39 0.46 0.42 0.50
Table 1. Pulling length of the air-cannon and the time it takes for the air doughnut to reach the tissue
The observations of this experiment are all in Table 1. The pulling length ranges from 15.00 cm to 40.00 cm, and the time intervals range from 0.39 s to 1.76 s. There is an obvious trend among the data: as the pulling length increases, the time decreases.
Analysis
Pulling length, x (cm±0.001cm) The speed of the air doughnut calculated, v (m/s) Average values of speed vave (m/s) Standard deviation of speed (m/s)
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6
15.00 2.60 2.99 2.42 2.47 2.27 2.45 2.53 0.244
20.00 3.39 3.48 3.64 3.03 3.25 2.96 3.29 0.261
25.00 4.94 5.56 4.71 5.13 5.26 4.71 5.05 0.334
30.00 6.25 6.45 6.15 6.15 6.06 6.25 6.22 0.134
35.00 7.14 7.55 7.69 7.27 7.69 7.27 7.44 0.238
40.00 10.00 9.30 10.26 8.70 9.52 8.00 9.30 0.838
Table 2. Pulling length of the air-cannon, the speeds of the air doughnut and their average and standard deviation
Sample Calculations for Speed Values:
Known: , .
Unknown:
Sample Calculations for Statistics:
Known: , See Table 2.
Unknown: ,
Regression Calculations:
Known: , , See Table 2.
Unknown: In , , ,
From Table 2 and Figure 2, we can see that the average speed and the pulling length have a linear relationship, but the line’s v-intercept is not close enough to 0 to be ignored.
Discussion
In this experiment, we used an air-cannon to fire air doughnuts toward a piece of tissue and measured the time the air doughnut traveled. By making the air doughnut move the tissue, we can study the motion of an invisible object—air doughnut—by studying its effect. It’s a very common and effective way scientists learn about the world.
The variations are relatively small. Even after the calculations, the errors are still, all under 10%. But when applying regression methods, we found that the regression line has a non-zero v-intercept. This is unexpected and intuitively doesn’t make sense. The air doughnut will have no net movement—thus having a speed of 0 m/s—if the air-cannon isn’t pulled back. However, this might be explained by the error in our measurements.
There are many sources of error which might have contributed to the fact that the regression line doesn’t pass through the point of origin. One significant source of error is that the time the air doughnut traveled is too small to be measured accurately, especially with longer pulling lengths. This is a random source of error because we do not know if this source of error will increase or decrease our measurements. This error is of great significance. It might be reduced by increasing the distance between the stand and the air-cannon.
Another source of error is the friction between the air doughnut and the air surrounding it. This is a systematic source of error and it will always increase our time measurements. This error is of great significance, and it is a very important reason for the negative v-intercept, especially when the regression line can be regarded as a line passing through the origin vertically translated downward. Unfortunately, there is no way to reduce this source of error in this air-cannon system.
Another source of error is that the air-cannon is not pulled back the same amount in each level of manipulated variable. This is classified as a random source of error since there is no way that we can learn whether this source of error will increase or decrease our time measurements. This source of error is of minor significance and it can be reduced by rechecking the pulling length before firing the air-cannon.
The fact that the tissue paper will not return to its exact position every time it was blasted is also a source of error. This can be classified as a random source of error because its effect on our measurements is unknown. This source of error is of minor significance and unfortunately there is no way to reduce the impact of this source of error.
Despite all these sources of errors, the results generally supported our hypothesis. The prediction that the speed of air doughnut will increase with the pulling length is supported, but the prediction that they are directly proportional is not supported, due to the non-zero v-intercept of the regression line.
So now, the question can be answered. The speed of air doughnut is partially proportional with the pulling length. If the pulling length increases, the speed of air doughnut will also increase.
Conclusion
The hypothesis is partially supported. The pulling length of the air-cannon is partially proportional to the speed of the air doughnut, and as the pulling length increases, the speed also increases. Since the standard deviations are generally small, percent errors are all under 10% and the regression coefficient is very close to 1, the results of this experiment are generally reliable.
Acknowledgements
I’d like to thank my instructor Dr. T Pike who provided guidance during the whole process.
I’d also like to thank my partners Jimmy Wang and Harry Du who provided lots of insightful ideas in our experiment. Without them, I couldn’t have possibly finished this lab.
I’d also like to thank all my classmates in the period 4 class of Dr. Pike’s Physics 15 IB class for their patience and help.
References
Cannon. (2009). Retrieved March 31, 2009 from the Internet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon
Cutnell, J.D. & Johnson, K.W. (2001). Cutnell & Johnson Physics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Gao, C. & Gao, S. (2004). Math 3. Beijing, China: People’s Education Press.
History of cannon. (2009). Retrieved March 31, 2009 from the Internet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_cannon
Hooke’s Law. (2009). Retrieved March 27, 2009 from the Internet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooke%27s_Law
Ideal Gas Law. (2009). Retrieved March 27, 2009 from the Internet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_gas_law
Impulse. (2009). Retrieved March 27, 2009 from the Internet: http://en. |
|