- 注册时间
- 2006-2-24
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 日志
- 阅读权限
- 100
|
发表于 2006-12-24 10:41:01
|
显示全部楼层
回复: 我要戒烟,能成功吗?
贴一篇Times 上的文章,增加点深度。
Tracking the smoking gene
by Ainsley Newson
A DNA test claims to identify the perfect quit-smoking strategy. Are there any butts?
With a ban on smoking in enclosed public places in England around the corner, now might be the time to kick the habit. But with so many treatments to help you quit, it can be difficult to choose — hypnosis, patches, medications, willpower? Now, however, one of the first “lifestyle” genetic tests is available, claiming to help identify exactly what approach is best for your genetic make-up, and to tailor a quit strategy to fit. It’s called NicoTest.
It sounds a like godsend, but scientists are less than unanimous about its benefits. The test has raised new questions about whether our high hopes about genetic testing have started a bandwagon that is beginning to run out of control.
NI_MPU('middle');About two thirds of the UK’s 14 million smokers want to quit, yet figures show that only 1 in 20 who stop “cold turkey” remains smoke-free a year later. The makers of NicoTest claim to be able to change all that. “The test ensures that a smoker takes the right treatment at the right dose from the outset,” says Mark Tucker, the chief executive of G-Nostics, the Oxford-based company behind the £94.99 test.
NicoTest analyses two genes called DRD2 and CYP2A6. DRD2 is important because it may influence whether we become addicted to nicotine. The theory is that the pleasure we get from tobacco relates to our brain cells being receptive to a “pleasure chemical” in the brain called dopamine. The nicotine in tobacco is believed to activate dopamine receptors in the brain, causing pleasure sensations. The DRD2 gene helps to regulate how receptive cells are to dopamine.
In some people, G-Nostics says, the gene is subtly altered, meaning that cells are less receptive to dopamine. Those people, it claims, are predisposed to being heavier smokers because they need more nicotine to get the same “reward” from smoking.
This heavily addicted group with an altered DRD2 gene may respond better to treatments that continue to feed the body nicotine — nicotine-replacement therapies, such as gum, patches or lozenges. The remaining 65 per cent of smokers who don’t have this alteration may respond better to drugs that reduce the urge to smoke, such as buproprion (Zyban).
NicoTest also analyses the CYP2A6 gene because it may influence how quickly smokers clear nicotine from the body. This is useful information to know when putting together individualised quitting programmes; people who get rid of nicotine from their bodies more slowly may need lower doses of nicotinereplacement therapies and may be able to wean themselves off them quicker.
But much of this is based on conjecture. While scientists have found a handful of genes influencing nicotine addiction, research, including G-Nostic’s, is still at an early stage. “It is almost certain that in 20 years’ time we will have tests for 50-100 genes that help to explain why one person smokes and gets hooked and another does not,” says Dr Saskia Sanderson, a research fellow in health psychology and genetics at University College London.
“But even then we still won’t be able to label someone as an addict on the basis of their genes because personality and behaviour are much more complex than that,” Dr Sanderson adds.
Imran Ahmed, 27, was smoking 20 cigarettes a day before taking the NicoTest six weeks ago and he has not smoked since. The test indicated that he had an altered DRD2 gene and that he would be a good candidate for nicotine replacment therapy rather than drugs, but he needed only low doses, the test found. It seems to have worked; psychologically, if nothing else.
“When I got the test result I made myself a certificate and put it on the wall next to the result. This authoritative advice has made me much more confident about quitting,” he says.
But critics have expressed concern about the test, currently available only from the company’s website. “It has been marketed without adequate supportive evidence,” says Robert West, a professor of tobacco studies at University College London. “It is all very interesting, but not close to being something to consider as a reliable technology.”
Dr Sanderson concurs: “While the principle behind the test is sound, the reality is that we’re still at the research stage and it’s too soon to be selling this kind of genetic test to the public.” Tucker disagrees. “I find that incredible because nothing is too soon for someone who is trying to quit smoking,” he says. “Anything that helps them to find a path to quitting can’t come soon enough.” He says that NicoTest is not only about genetics. “Our online support programme helps to prepare a smoker to quit and maintain a smoke-free lifestyle. Customers receive tailored cognitive behavioural advice, an 11-week course of motivational e-mail messages and access to a professionally moderated chat room.” |
|