驿路枫情-加拿大移民论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

驿路枫情h2 驿路枫情h2 驿路枫情h2 驿路枫情h4
查看: 2760|回复: 16

[消息公布] 看了这个,真替孩子高兴!

[复制链接]
发表于 2010-12-8 04:31:41 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 东方明珠 于 2010-12-8 04:36 编辑

'Wake-up call': U.S. students trail global leaders

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

OECD
EPA



United States students are continuing to trail behind their peers in a pack of higher performing nations, according to results from a key international assessment.
Scores from the 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment released Tuesday show 15-year-old students in the U.S. performing about average in reading and science, and below average in math. Out of 34 countries, the U.S. ranked 14th in reading, 17th in science and 25th in math.
Those scores are all higher than those from 2003 and 2006, but far behind the highest scoring countries, including South Korea, Finland and Singapore, Hong Kong and Shanghai in China and Canada.
'Brutal truth' "This is an absolute wake-up call for America," U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in an interview with The Associated Press. "The results are extraordinarily challenging to us and we have to deal with the brutal truth. We have to get much more serious about investing in education."

The PISA exam is one of a handful of tests that compare educational levels across nations, and is considered to be the most comprehensive. The test focuses on how well students are able to apply their knowledge in math, reading and science to real-life situations. Some 470,000 students took the test in 2009 in 65 countries and educational systems, from poor, underdeveloped nations to the most wealthy.
Student performance on international assessments is considered especially relevant as today's high school graduates enter a global job market, where highly skilled workers are in increasing demand.
The United States' mediocre scores on the PISA exam have repeatedly been highlighted by the Obama administration and others pushing for education reform. A number of countries have made significant improvements in recent years, while the U.S. has made only incremental advancements.
Grim figures Between 1995 and 2008, for example, the United States slipped from ranking second in college graduation rates to 13th, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the Paris-based organization that develops and administers the PISA exam. Of 34 OECD countries, only 8 have a lower high school graduation rate.
Responding to the grim figures, President Barack Obama has set a goal for the U.S. to have the highest proportion of students graduating from college in 2020.
"We live in a globally competitive knowledge based economy, and our children today are at a competitive disadvantage with children from other countries," Duncan said. "That is absolutely unfair to our children and that puts our country's long term economic prosperity absolutely at risk."
The impact of improving math, reading and science scores could be radical: A recent OECD study with Stanford University projected that if the U.S. boosted its average PISA scores by 25 points over the next 20 years, there would be a gain of $41 trillion in the U.S. economy over the lifetime of the generation born in 2010.

The 2009 exam had an extra focus on reading, and looked at how factors such as family background, equity of resources, and governance influence educational outcomes.
The top performers in reading were South Korea, Finland, Hong Kong and Shanghai in China, Singapore, Canada, New Zealand, Japan and Australia.
The gap between the highest performing countries and the United States is stark — students in Shanghai, for example, had an average score of 556 points in reading, 56 points higher than the 500-point average reached by United States students. Shanghai students also posted the highest score in math, with an average of 600 points, 113 points higher than the 487 point U.S. average.

OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria cited ongoing evaluations, an emphasis on the importance of education, and a curriculum that is relevant to everyday life as reasons for the Chinese success.
"They don't only produce children who know the matters by heart," Gurria said. "They're educated to understand and face the challenges of real life."
He noted that the Chinese scores were strong in all three subject areas.
"That speaks about who is going to be leading tomorrow," Gurria said.
The Shanghai and Hong Kong results are certainly unrepresentative of China as a whole — additional results from other regions will be released next year, but Andreas Schleicher, head of the Indicators and Analysis Division at the OECD said he didn't expect much variation.
The report also notes that the GDP per capita in Shanghai is well below the OECD average — highlighting another finding of the study: Low national income does not necessarily signify poor educational performance. South Korea, another top performer, also has a GDP below the OECD average.

"While national income and educational achievement are still related, PISA shows that two countries with similar levels of prosperity can produce very different results," Gurria said. "This shows that an image of a world divided neatly into rich and well-educated countries and poor and badly education countries is now out of date."

The United States spends more per student, on average, than other countries. In the 2009 PISA study, only Luxembourg spent more per student. The report notes that countries like Estonia and Poland perform at about the same level as the United States, while spending less than half the amount per student.
"I think we have to invest in reform, not in the status quo," Duncan said.
The PISA study does not look to draw cause-and-effect relationships, but does highlight some findings about what the top performing countries tend to have in common.
Schleicher noted that some of the top systems are centralized, while others are very decentralized. There was also much variation in class sizes, with some of the best performers finding success in putting quality teachers in larger classes. But in each case, teachers are subject to evaluations and have a high standing in society. Also, schools have a degree of autonomy in determining their curriculum — but are also held accountable.
"In other words, autonomy without accountability would be a very bad outcome," he said.
Common academic standards He said many of the things the United States is doing, such as developing common academic standards and smarter assessment systems, are important, positive changes.
"What we have seen from other countries doing similar things is those initiatives do pay off in the longer term," Schleicher said.
The study found that the best school systems were also the most equitable, meaning students from disadvantaged backgrounds were just as likely to do well academically. In the U.S., 17 percent of the variation in student performance was found to be related to a pupil's background — compared to 9 percent, for example, in Canada.
The report notes that Canadian 15-year-olds, on average, perform more than one school year ahead in math than 15-year-olds in the United States, and more than a half year ahead in reading and science. Canada, like the U.S., has a decentralized education system.
"Canada's experiences raise questions about why the United States has so far not equaled the performance of it northern neighbor," the report states.

Mexico had the lowest reading score among OECD member countries, with an average of 425 points — the equivalent of more than two school years behind the highest member score. Among all 2009 participants, there was a gap of 242 points between the highest and lowest reading scores — equal to more than six years of schooling.
Mexico was commended for reducing the number of low performers in reading, and for improving math scores.
Gurria said the report's overall message is that, "Even in this crisis and even with the expenditure cuts, keep on supporting the education but also look at what successful systems have in common. They all can be very different but they have in common a number of features that can really make for better systems."
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-8 05:58:04 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 闲云 于 2010-12-8 06:01 编辑

再分享一下这项研究揭示的加拿大各省教育水平的差异:

安大略省在阅读上拔得头筹
Lecture form.bmp

评分

参与人数 1财富 +5 收起 理由
东方明珠 + 5 Merci.

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-8 06:02:48 | 显示全部楼层
魁省和阿省分别在数学和科学上一马当先
pcma-math.bmp

评分

参与人数 1财富 +5 收起 理由
东方明珠 + 5 Merci encore.

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-8 06:04:21 | 显示全部楼层
总体上,安省、魁省、阿省和BC省处在加拿大教育水平的第一集团
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-8 06:30:55 | 显示全部楼层
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-8 06:37:46 | 显示全部楼层
闲云版主来的正是时候,呵呵,偶也看过一个类似的统计,说阿省的科学和数学都名列前茅。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-8 09:37:35 | 显示全部楼层
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-8 11:21:30 | 显示全部楼层
昨天在纽约时报上看到这个新闻后,再次开始犹豫何时来加长登的问题(虽然现在还没拿到VISA),感觉去加上的中学可能还没有现在上的中学好。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-8 17:40:18 | 显示全部楼层
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/ns/nightly_news/#40558253
今早看的新闻,评估结果认为上海最好,并认为十年内上海的成功可以普及至全中国

评分

参与人数 1财富 +5 收起 理由
东方明珠 + 5 TKS.

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-11 21:13:04 | 显示全部楼层
今早看的新闻,评估结果认为上海最好,并认为十年内上海的成功可以普及至全中国
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-12 00:04:58 | 显示全部楼层
上海的什么成功呀?惭愧,什么英语法语的都不懂。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-12 00:18:03 | 显示全部楼层
  经合组织特别教育顾问施莱歇尔表示,中国绝对不应该被低估。他指出:“中国的学校灵活、机动。实际上,我们在中国的12个省份进行了Pisa测试,即使在一些欠发达地区,测试成绩也接近于经合组织的平均水平。”(综合中国日报、解放日报)

  声音>>>

  重视教育质量的结果

  OECD教育专家卡波尼尔表示:

  “上海学生取得的成绩主要是重视教育质量的结果。在上海这个拥有2000万人的大都市里,校方总是能够遵循政策为学生们提供最棒的教学条件和师资队伍。”

  预示更强经济增长力

  OECD秘书长古里亚认为:“良好的教育质量意味着该国在未来会有更强的经济增长力。


是这个吗?奇怪,别国是以国家为单位,中国怎么就单独测试上海?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-12 06:42:49 | 显示全部楼层
中国的教育质量本来就不差,差的是教育体系和观念的落后。

只要高考这根指挥棒不倒,中国的教育就永远是一种畸形教育。

分数,分数,还是分数。。。

就像我们家小清茶曾经说过的:我最擅长的就是考试,长大了做什么好呢?

评分

参与人数 1财富 +5 收起 理由
huanqiuheding + 5 有道理

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-12 09:51:39 | 显示全部楼层
同意楼上的看法,NBC的新闻政治性很强,客观性不及BBC。
我每天听NBC只为练听力。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-12 10:27:28 | 显示全部楼层
中国的教育质量本来就不差,差的是教育体系和观念的落后。

只要高考这根指挥棒不倒,中国的教育就永远是一种畸形教育。

分数,分数,还是分数。。。

就像我们家小清茶曾经说过的:我最擅长的就是考试,长大了做什 ...
一杯清茶 发表于 2010-12-12 06:42

是啊!所以咱们中国人不能只看这成绩就沾沾自喜,很多方面还是需要学习的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-13 21:33:16 | 显示全部楼层
但上海的教育在中国确实是非常好的。
上海就没有北京那么严重的择校(包括择园)现象。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-14 01:31:40 | 显示全部楼层
但上海的教育在中国确实是非常好的。
上海就没有北京那么严重的择校(包括择园)现象。
汉人陈三 发表于 2010-12-13 21:33

唉!这成绩是用多大代价换来的呀?你没看镜头里上海的学生几乎个个都戴眼镜吗?偶宁可孩子学习差点,也要孩子健康开心!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|驿路枫情加拿大华人网

GMT+8, 2025-2-26 18:36 , Processed in 0.197167 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, File On.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表