驿路枫情-加拿大移民论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

驿路枫情h2 驿路枫情h2 驿路枫情h2 驿路枫情h4
查看: 2094|回复: 5

[消息公布] 用TekSavvy 的要小心了!!!!

[复制链接]
发表于 2014-2-22 09:25:47 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 lamjin 于 2014-2-22 09:26 编辑

法院判决让teksavvy 把下载盗版电影的用户名单,交给电影公司。
Canadian ISP to name subscribers linked to alleged downloading of films

TORONTO – A Canadian Internet service provider has been ordered to hand over the names and addresses of about 2,000 customers who allegedly downloaded movies online.
A Federal Court decision released Thursday compels Ontario-based TekSavvy to identify the customers allegedly linked to downloads of films by the U.S. production company Voltage Pictures, which is behind the likes of “The Hurt Locker,” “Dallas Buyers Club” and “Don Jon.”
As a result, those TekSavvy customers could eventually receive a letter from Voltage threatening legal action. Under the federal Copyright Act, statutory damages for non-commercial infringement range between $100 and $5,000.
“It’s going to be up to the courts to decide what the appropriate penalty is,” said Voltage’s lawyer James Zibarras, who called the court decision “great” and “well balanced.”
“I think to date rightsholders’ interests have been ignored and really what this does is adjust the pendulum a bit.
“Obviously the public has almost become accustomed to downloading movies for free and it’s being done on a massive scale. And of course the public loves justifying what they’re doing and when someone tries to stop it they invariably want to come up with arguments as to why it should not be stopped.”
But while the court sided with Voltage’s efforts to go after copyright violators, it sought to protect against the company acting “inappropriately in the enforcement of its rights to the detriment of innocent Internet users.”
“On the facts of this case, there is some evidence that Voltage has been engaged in litigation which may have an improper purpose. However, the evidence is not sufficiently compelling for this court at this juncture in the proceeding to make any definitive determination of the motive of Voltage,” wrote judge Kevin Aalto.
Aalto ordered that before Voltage can send a letter to the alleged downloaders, it must return to court to get the wording of its communications cleared by a case management judge.
“In order to ensure there is no inappropriate language in any demand letter sent to the alleged infringers, the draft demand letter will be provided to the court for review,” Aalto wrote.
“Any correspondence sent by Voltage to any subscriber shall clearly state in bold type that no court has yet made a determination that such subscriber has infringed or is liable in any way for payment of damages.”
Voltage was also ordered to pay any costs that TekSavvy incurs in identifying the customers in the case, as well as legal fees.
The Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, which had intervenor status in the case, said it was “quite pleased” with the decision and expected Voltage wouldn’t see any financial incentive in going after downloaders, particularly since it must pay TekSavvy’s “substantial” costs.
CIPPIC director David Fewer said his read of the decision is that the court would not be eager to assign penalties at the higher range of what the Copyright Act allows.
“If Voltage is asking for figures in excess of ($100) I think the court is going to shut them down pretty darn quickly,” Fewer said.
“And if that’s the case I think Voltage is done because this is no longer a viable business model. And that’s what the whole copyright troll thing is about, it’s about using the court process to get settlements that are in excess of what you could get for (actual) damages to scare people into settling.”
Fewer said he was happy that the court will vet any letters that Voltage sends to alleged copyright offenders, since they’re typically designed to scare people into settling a case.
“A lot of people just pay the settlement rather than deal with the uncertainty and the anxiety of the claim — and the model is predicated on that,” he said.
“Certain people are risk averse and it’s cheaper to settle rather than to hire a lawyer to deal with it, even if you are innocent.”

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-2-22 09:35:23 | 显示全部楼层
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-2-22 10:19:31 | 显示全部楼层
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-2-22 11:36:18 | 显示全部楼层
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2014-2-22 11:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-2-22 13:00:39 | 显示全部楼层
变相讹诈。和专利流氓一样的版权流氓,不抓源头获利时收网
你初一我十五,混的都要还啊,NND看个片真TMD费劲
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|驿路枫情加拿大华人网

GMT+8, 2024-12-2 12:21 , Processed in 0.128052 second(s), 7 queries , Gzip On, File On.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表