请发我悄悄话的筒子们看过来

小树参天

那个诉讼是有人趁这个机会捞钱的，他们找的是个加拿大没信誉的律师，请看这里http://forum./showthread.php?t=559118，那些人拼命鼓动你们参加诉讼，这样这个律师可以赚很多律师费，而鼓动你们的人可以拿律师费提成。他们根本不在乎官司输赢，因为和他们没关系，他们的律师费拿到就可以了 。我们在揭露这个事情的真相，的管理们慌了，怕我们妨碍他们捞这个钱，于是他们开始在香港版封ID了，他们心虚了。

小树参天

我回不了悄悄话，抱歉，只能这样了。

那时枫叶

恩，以下是我配合老傅要求做的一些调查，供参考。

我用Tim Leahy在网站查询到的资料如下图所示：


>
>其一，他的执照是L1，定义如下（可以在安大略省做律师服务）：
>
>Class L1
>Subject to any terms, conditions, limitations or restrictions imposed on
>the class of licence or on the licensee and subject to any order made under The

>Law Society Act<http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90l08_e.htm>,
>a licensee who holds a Class L1 licence is entitled to practise law in
>Ontario as a barrister and solicitor.
>
>我感觉这个说明他的服务范围是有局限性？
>
>其二，资料显示他曾经有个处分，是04年4月22日发生的，06年4月5日有个结果。但具体情况看不到。
>
>以下是查到的相关定义：

>*Conduct*
>
>The Law Society may ask a hearing panel to determine whether a lawyer or
>paralegal has engaged in professional misconduct or conduct unbecoming a
>lawyer or paralegal. Generally, professional misconduct or conduct
>unbecoming means conduct that tends to bring discredit upon the legal
>profession, for example, violating one of the Law Society's rules of
>conduct or committing a serious crime.
>

>*Notice of appeal *
>
>Either side may appeal a final decision and order made by a hearing panel,
>in which case, the matter may be heard by an appeal panel.

其三，我曾经向他的中国代理人要求他的在职律师事务所信息，未果。

天狼星

小树参天

一个因为违反律师职业操守的律师，在加拿大当然没啥信誉可言了，欺负咱们不懂中文，招个代理人忽悠了91的人去诉讼，不管官司输赢，拿到律师费就好。

wondering

恩，以下是我配合老傅要求做的一些调查，供参考。

我用Tim Leahy在网站查询到的资料如下图所示：

70946
>
>其一，他的执照是L1，定义如下（可以在安大略省做律师服务）：
>
>Class L1
>Subject to any terms, cond ...
非娜 发表于 2012-4-22 19:27

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

娜，第一条关于L1是官话，不是问题；第二条违纪历史，我从upper canada law society的网页上进去可以看到啊，内容如下：

Conduct Proceeding:22-Apr-2004                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
Timothy Edward Leahy was found guilty of professional misconduct for:  from approximately August 15, 1997 to June 27, 2001, engaging in the private practice of law, while he did not have insurance, including but not limited to appearing as counsel in the Federal Court of Canada; breaching a Summary Order dated June 20, 2001, made by a single bencher which, effective June 28, 2001, suspended his rights and privileges as a member of the Law Society, including his right to practice law, by maintaining an active practice and by holding himself out as a Barrister and Solicitor duly entitled to practice law, throughout the period from June 28, 2001 to March 27, 2002; and from approximately March 27, 2002 to September 30, 2002, engaging in the private practice of law while he did not have insurance, including but not limited to appearing as counsel in the Federal Court of Canada.  By Decision and Order dated April 22, 2004, the Hearing Panel ordered that:  the Member's rights and privileges are suspended for a period of 9 months, commencing two weeks after the date of the Reasons for Decision (suspension commenced on May 6, 2004); the Member pay LAWPRO the insurance fees and levies that a member in the Member's circumstances would have been required to pay for the period of time that the Hearing Panel found that the Member practiced law while uninsured; and the Member pay these arrears either by making annual payments of $2,000.00 on the first day of January of each year or by making quarterly payments of $500.00 on the last day of March, June, September and December of each year until the entire sum is remitted.                                                                                    

Appeal:05-Apr-2006                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
By Notice of Appeal dated June 23, 2004, Timothy Edward Leahy appealed the Order of the Hearing Panel, dated April 22, 2004. On August 23, 2004, the appeal was deemed abandoned. By Notice of Motion dated September 8, 2004, the Member filed to have the Notice of Deemed Abandonment set aside.  By Order dated March 1, 2006, the Appeals Management Tribunal ordered that the motion and the appeal are dismissed.

小树参天

虽然还有执照，但是圈内已经丧失信誉，代理官司的话，法官对他的话又会听信多少呢？

再比如说，有个司机以前出过事故，虽然过了些时候又拿到驾照了，你愿意雇佣这样的人做司机？为什么不聘请一个履历清白的人呢？也是对自己负责。