加华裔女学生$57000爱玛仕只报$710面临遣返
今天在报纸上看到中国的女留学生赵某在维多利亚大学读书，去拉斯维加斯买了5万多的爱玛仕，在进加拿大时只申报了$710被当场查出，被罚款了1万多以后，还被告到法院，有可能签证不能更新，面临遣返。 A “very wealthy” Chinese national who only claimed $710 in purchases but brought back $57,000 in luxury goods from Hermes in Las Vegas has been convicted and fined following a Crown appeal.Xiaochen Zhao, a University of Victoria student here on visa, had her charges stayed earlier on condition of community service after a judge heard she’d likely be “inadmissible” in Canada with a conviction.
In a Wednesday decision, however, the B.C. Court of Appeal disagreed. It said immigration issues “must not divert the judge” from an appropriate sentence.
The court found the frequent traveller — a 24-year-old economics student and daughter of a wealthy Beijing businessman — had twice brought back undeclared goods in the space of a month in November 2011.
Various Hermes products, “including a handbag, wallet, shoes, jewellery, scarves, and accessories” — gifts for her parents, she told the court — were undeclared when she was caught after flying back into Canada.
Paying the court-ordered fine of $10,000 wasn’t the issue. Zhao, the court heard, was in the final year of her university program and wanted to remain in Canada to finish it — with the possibility of entering a financial career in the country. The conviction would have put her status in Canada in jeopardy.
“We are not faced with the limited adjustment to an otherwise fit sentence to avoid unnecessary consequences,” Justice Edward Chiasson wrote in the appeal decision.
“This case involves abandoning a criminal sanction that is fit and substituting for it a completely different sanction because a conviction might have serious immigration implications for the offender.”
The amount of tax she would’ve had to pay if the goods were declared was $9,000.
Border authorities also order her to pay $15,400, which included penalties.
The court noted whether Zhao is deported would be for immigration authorities to decide. 连发几篇这样的帖，是引caro来拍姜的节奏么 。。。 :-D 连发几篇这样的帖，是引caro来拍姜的节奏么 。。。 :-D
Ruibin 发表于 2014-3-14 13:50 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
辛勤发帖，至少体现了劳模精神啊，
为了让论坛不至于太冷清吧。
CARO怒气已消，估计把砖已扔完了，不会有节奏了 这个不拍，花５万买爱玛士被罚被遣返实属活该:-D 是啊,原文在这里http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/2014/03/12/wealthy-foreign-student-wants-visa-renewed-after-dodging-customs
呵呵, 我看到其他论坛经常乱写,我们这里一般都很准确, 看来老金这次也是不读原文直接照抄了.
女生不是"还被告到法院", 是自行APPEAL到法院试图推翻CBSA的决定, 主要是推翻removal order. 法院驳回了她的appeal.
抛开该女生的奢侈行为不谈, 只说以下这件事情的事后处理程序本身:
通常来说, 一个有效签证持有者入境时被CBSA认为inadmissible, 你会被提供两个选择: 1.主动收回入境申请并自行返回, 系统不留记录. 2.颁发一个有条件的Removal order并临时允许入境. 这个Removal order可以向IRB appeal. 但是misrepresentation或者crime造成的inadmissible是没有这个appeal的权利的. 所以这个案子只有司法上诉一条途径. 而她的上诉被驳回了, 只能离境.
该女生离境后可以申请再次入境. 昨天新闻说一２１岁女孩去香港洗钱１００亿，弃３０００万保释金潜逃。8-) 当下中国有钱人及其子女的不当和失德行为的确还是很多啊！ 当下中国有钱人及其子女的不当和失德行为的确还是很多啊！
齐鲁风 发表于 2014-3-15 07:15 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif富不知守身
国之难啊 他们爹妈是贪官是强盗，经商挣的钱还用洗白吗？『可恶』 当下中国有钱人及其子女的不当和失德行为的确还是很多啊！
齐鲁风 发表于 2014-3-15 07:15 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
其实还是失身的更多。 是啊,原文在这里http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/2014/03/12/wealthy-foreign-student-wants-visa-renewed-after-dodging-customs
是啊,原文在这里http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/2014/0 ... ter-dodging-customs
呵呵, 我看到其他论坛经常乱写,我们这里一般都很准确, 看来老金这次也是不读原文直接照抄了.
女生不是"还被告到法院", 是自行APPEAL到法院试图推翻CBSA的决定, 主要是推翻removal order. 法院驳回了她的appeal.
抛开该女生的奢侈行为不谈, 只说以下这件事情的事后处理程序本身:
通常来说, 一个有效签证持有者入境时被CBSA认为inadmissible, 你会被提供两个选择: 1.主动收回入境申请并自行返回, 系统不留记录. 2.颁发一个有条件的Removal order并临时允许入境. 这个Removal order可以向IRB appeal. 但是misrepresentation或者crime造成的inadmissible是没有这个appeal的权利的. 所以这个案子只有司法上诉一条途径. 而她的上诉被驳回了, 只能离境.
该女生离境后可以申请再次入境.
逗逗飞 发表于 2014-3-15 03:30 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
你这完全是臆想。 切 为什么说你是臆想呢？
一个单词就能告诉你是不是被告到法院，注意第一段最后两个单词 Crown appeal。 这个Crown
为啥第一个是大写字母呢？ 另外一个词 convicted or conviction，控罪成立的判决. 这个不是CBSA 能做出的。 另外，你对案件的解释，就是胡解释。
其实还是失身的更多。
lamjin 发表于 2014-3-15 10:25 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
老金看来也是擅长湿身的啊，搞的那个让大家感到冷的照片就是刚湿身后的照的吧；
你自己愿意湿就湿吧，别把小孩也带上啊 各省三级法院， 由低到高。
provincial court
supreme court
Court of Appeal
这个案子已经打过了三级法院了，在provincial court 这女的输了，这女的上诉到省高院，赢了， 检方又上诉到省上诉庭，上诉庭又推翻了省高院的判决。现在新闻说的这个就是省上诉庭的判决。 NM真有钱，1个包包比大多数人的车都贵 那么多钱买个包包？钱多也不是这样花的吧！『可恶』
页:
[1]
2