重要动态！！！
重要动态 http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/bulletins/2012/ob479A.asp对最近错发签证的筒子是个好消息。不过，可别断章取义，这个只是对错发签证的补救办法，不适合其他情况呦。 也不是律师拿去忽悠人的所谓材料哦。
This public policy is a temporary measure solely for the purpose of addressing cases to date in which visas have been issued in respect of terminated FSWapplications. This public policy must not be construed as a facilitative measure for additional cases. Immigration Program Managers are reminded that they are to ensure that no terminated FSW applications continue to be processed. 这条最新动态里，让筒子们存在错误认识的是它包含了这么一句
However, despite being terminated by operation of law, a number of cases were finalized and visas were issued in error. In view of the exceptional circumstances, and pursuant to his authority under section 25.2 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), the Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism has established that there are public policy considerations warranting the granting of permanent residence and the granting of necessary exemptions (including the requirement to pay processing fees) to permit the issuance of a permanent residence visa to persons who, despite the termination of their applications, had their FSW visa applications processed to a final decision and were issued permanent resident visas. 我在这里好像没有看到错发签证的范围包括哪些。不知道我们这批329后ME，629前发签证的的是否属于错发签证的。按照OB442，我们应该属于正常发签证的，但这里描述的又是
Federal Skilled Worker (FSW) applications that were made before February 27, 2008, were terminated by operation of law if a decision based on FSW program selection criteria had not been made by an immigration officer before March 29, 2012.
好像我们又属于错发签证的，感觉很疑惑，尤其我还没登录呢。。。。有大侠能给解释下吗 本帖最后由 lamjin 于 2012-12-4 12:34 编辑
这是标准
“This person meets the criteria of the temporary public policy established on November 29, 2012 to permit the issuance of a permanent resident visa to persons who:
made an application for a permanent resident visa under the FSW class before February 27, 2008, and in respect of whom an officer had not established before March 29, 2012, that they met the selection criteria and other requirements applicable to that class, and who thereby fall within the termination provision in section 87.4(1) of IRPA; and
who, despite the termination of their applications, had their FSW visa applications processed to a final decision and were issued permanent resident visas.”
就是 227 前申请的， 329 前没有SD， 是被一刀切。 但他们的案子还是被处理了，并发了visa 的。 这样说我们应该属于这个被错发的范围的，看网站上说要交回签证，我觉得好危险啊，我们真的要主动交回去吗。还是未收到信件就先不理，正常登陆？ 如果你是这类的， 你的visa 是无效的，登录不了的。
但这次，CIC 已经都给你们放水了， 按照要求退回签证，完成相应的手续，会给你们发新的签证，这个不用担心。 如果不确定，抓紧时间很使馆联系，确定你是否是属于错发签证的这批。 这是标准
“This person meets the criteria of the temporary public policy established on November 29, 2012 to permit the issuance of a permanent resident visa to persons who:
made an application for a permanent resident visa under the FSW class before February 27, 2008, and in respect of whom an officer had not established before March 29, 2012, that they met the selection criteria and other requirements applicable to that class, and who thereby fall within the termination provision in section 87.4(1) of IRPA; and
who, despite the termination of their applications, had their FSW visa applications processed to a final decision and were issued permanent resident visas.”
就是 227 前申请的， 329 前没有SD， 是被一刀切。 但他们的案子还是被处理了，并发了visa 的。...
lamjin 发表于 2012-12-3 20:58 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
按字面理解是对的；
但按实际情况，只说对了一半！
-
-
-
如果你是这类的， 你的visa 是无效的，登录不了的。
但这次，CIC 已经都给你们放水了， 按照要求退回签证，完成相应的手续，会给你们发新的签证，这个不用担心。 如果不确定，抓紧时间很使馆联系，确定你是否是属于错发签证的这批。 ...
lamjin 发表于 2012-12-3 20:30 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
回答不正确，扣10分！ 得，瑞(Rui)又和懒（Lam）干上了！:-D 我在这里好像没有看到错发签证的范围包括哪些。不知道我们这批329后ME，629前发签证的的是否属于错发签证的。按照OB442，我们应该属于正常发签证的，但这里描述的又是
Federal Skilled Worker (FSW) applications that were made before February 27, 2008, were terminated by operation of law if a decision based on FSW program selection criteria had not been made by an immigration officer before March 29, 2012.
好像我们又属于错发签证的，感觉很疑惑，尤其我还没登录呢。。。。有大侠能给解释下吗
mylittlestone 发表于 2012-12-3 20:22 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif329后ME、629前发签证的，是经得起考验的“白金”签证，属于OB442办法内应发签证类别，不属于错发签证。
mylittlestone，还有所有拿到签证的香港91同学，都是这种“白金”签证，货真价实，来之不易！！ 跟香港91签证的“329后ME，629前发签”相比，这次全球错发的150个签证，有两个明显不同的特征：329前ME，629后发签。
其中“329前ME”这个特征乍看属于OB442办法里不被切的、安全的案子，所以引起混乱。
按字面理解是对的；
但按实际情况，只说对了一半！
-
-
-
回答不正确，扣10分！
Ruibin 发表于 2012-12-4 13:16 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
哪里不正确？
哪里不正确？
lamjin 发表于 2012-12-3 22:30 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif不能因为符合“227 前申请的， 329 前没有SD，之后拿到的签证”，就判定人家的签证是无效的。
还有“629前发签”这个关键条件你没考虑到。
枫情“227 前申请的， 329 前没有SD，之后拿到签证”的人很多啊，但人家的签证恰恰都是有效的，就是因为多了“629前发签”这个护身符。
真正属于你提到的“227 前申请的， 329 前没有SD”，目前被追判“签证失效”的人，枫情没有！ 本帖最后由 lamjin 于 2012-12-4 15:12 编辑
不能根据“227 前申请的， 329 前没有SD”这个条件，就判定人家的签证是无效的。
还有“629前发签”这个关键条件你没考虑到。
枫情“227 前申请的， 329 前没有SD”，然后拿到签证的人很多啊，但人家的签证恰恰都是 ...
Ruibin 发表于 2012-12-4 15:00 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
我说他的签证是无效的了吗？ 前面还两个字“如果”。 另外， 我用““227 前申请的， 329 前没有SD” 做判定条件了吗？
如果他不十分确定，我是让他问使馆，而不是自己猜测，我没有判定签证是否有效还是无效。
如果说判定条件，那应该也是 “227 前申请的， 329 前没有SD， 是在被一刀切范围内。 尽管案已经终止，但他们的案子还是被处理了，并发了visa 。” 我一早看到你说“如果”了，但这也不能掩盖你差点误导小石头的事实！！
不过鉴于你毕竟说了“如果”，所以我也以当量用词，只说你“不正确”，而没说你“全错”啊！
:-D 你怎么知道人家是 227 之前申请的？ 我一早看到你说“如果”了，但这也不能掩盖你差点误导小石头的事实！！
不过鉴于你毕竟说了“如果”，所以我也以当量用词，只说你“不正确”，而没说你“全错”啊！
:-D ...
Ruibin 发表于 2012-12-4 16:04 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
问使馆，比自己在那猜更可靠。 你怎么知道人家是 227 之前申请的？
lamjin 发表于 2012-12-4 00:13 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif这个问题问对人了。。。:-D
香港91极速行动，每个成员我都记得。。。 http://www.ourdream.ca/forums/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=104391 支持瑞版，
打倒老金！
『Dead-Horse』 挺好的，两高手相辨，我可不是打酱油的，是来学习的，^_^。
祝二位好运！！ 支持瑞版，
打倒老金！
『Dead-Horse』
红酒 发表于 2012-12-4 04:37 http://ourdream.ca/forums/static/image/common/back.gif
两虎相争，必有看热闹的，也必有打酱油的。
页:
[1]
2